From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q2RExJda097411 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:59:20 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:59:17 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] repair: fix the variable-width nlink array Message-ID: <20120327145917.GA31635@infradead.org> References: <20120228174223.GA6148@infradead.org> <20120301212822.GM7762@sgi.com> <20120302074433.GA4117@infradead.org> <20120326174914.GR8451@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120326174914.GR8451@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ben Myers Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:49:14PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > Hey Christoph, > > On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:44:33AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 03:28:22PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > > > On my machine test 030 has regressed. It passed on 3.1.7. > > > > That's an older change. I have a fix in my local tree, but it needs > > polishing so that it still works with older repair versions. > > Have you had a chance to work on your fix for 030? Sorry, I still haven't managed to get back to speed on xfstests, we are still missing tons of external commits, and various testcases seem to fail right now. I'll get back to it this weekend hopefully. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs