From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q2RHIasX133869 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:18:37 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id VYBWAarEmz2gSXoF (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:03:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:03:09 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Do background CIL flushes via a workqueue Message-ID: <20120327170309.GA6712@infradead.org> References: <1332841605-3538-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20120327143127.GA11434@infradead.org> <20120327155759.GB28707@redhat.com> <20120327160300.GA22555@infradead.org> <20120327161941.GC28707@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120327161941.GC28707@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Vivek Goyal Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:19:41PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > So xfs either need to resort to similar optimizaiton where IO type from > both the process context is of same type or try to do all the IO from > one process context. All XFS log I/O is marked SYNC and (FUA and/or FLUSH). _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs