From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q2SIhL5d171376 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:43:21 -0500 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:43:30 -0500 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] xfs: initialise xfssync work before running quotachecks Message-ID: <20120328184330.GC8451@sgi.com> References: <1332393313-1955-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1332393313-1955-4-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20120328173829.GD7762@sgi.com> <20120328180203.GA24483@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120328180203.GA24483@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 02:02:03PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:38:29PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > > I haven't seen a patch to use d_make_root instead of d_alloc_root, so we'll > > take the earlier version of this patch... this one doesn't apply. ;) > > d_alloc_root is gone in mainline. Maybe get the next pull request out > without this patch, and then send it post -rc1 on a tree based upton > rc1? That sounds good to me. -Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs