public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] xfs: check for buffer errors before waiting
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:07:04 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120329220704.GB18323@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F74D89B.1060008@sgi.com>

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 04:48:11PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> On 03/29/12 16:10, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 02:04:09PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> >If the previous user of the buffer got an error, it is not
> >guaranteed to be cleared because the buffer is not re-initialised.
> >i.e. it's an uncached buffer that we control completely and reuse
> >from IO to IO with just a reset of the bno and length. If b_error is
> >non zero here, then the IO can fail because nothing else clears the
> >error in the dispatch path....
> 
> Thank-you for the explanation.
> 
> FYI: I am having problems with the patches applying. This patch
> complained at hunk at offset 623. Maybe I am using too new of kernel
> source.

That's because they are based on top of a current TOT mainline and
Christoph's dio ilock and xfsbufd removal changes.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-29 22:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-29 12:23 [PATCH 0/8] xfs: clean up unit usage in xfs_buf V2 Dave Chinner
2012-03-29 12:23 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: check for buffer errors before waiting Dave Chinner
2012-03-29 19:04   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-03-29 21:10     ` Dave Chinner
2012-03-29 21:48       ` Mark Tinguely
2012-03-29 22:07         ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2012-03-29 19:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-03-29 21:17     ` Dave Chinner
2012-03-29 12:23 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: fix incorrect b_offset initialisation Dave Chinner
2012-03-29 19:13   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-03-29 20:43   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-03-29 12:23 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: use kmem_zone_zalloc for buffers Dave Chinner
2012-03-29 19:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-03-29 20:45   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-03-29 12:23 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: clean up buffer get/read call API Dave Chinner
2012-03-30 19:12   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-03-29 12:23 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: kill b_file_offset Dave Chinner
2012-03-30 19:12   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-03-29 12:23 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: use blocks for counting length of buffers Dave Chinner
2012-03-29 19:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-03-30 19:13   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-03-29 12:23 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: use blocks for storing the desired IO size Dave Chinner
2012-03-30 19:13   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-03-29 12:23 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: kill xfs_buf_btoc Dave Chinner
2012-03-29 19:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-03-30 19:13   ` Mark Tinguely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120329220704.GB18323@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=tinguely@sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox