From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q3BK6ZjV106275 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:06:35 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ZZzEkRGZx535R00s (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:06:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:06:32 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: kill xfs_read_buf() Message-ID: <20120411200632.GH28816@infradead.org> References: <1334052213-26870-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1334052213-26870-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1334052213-26870-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Looks good in general, but I'd be tempted to say the semantics changes to xfs_trans_read_buf should be a separate patch from killing xfs_read_buf. Either way: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs