From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q3BK8ObH106375 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:08:24 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id yIk7O1xvR88NalIW (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:08:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:08:22 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] xfs: More xfs_buf cleanups Message-ID: <20120411200821.GK28816@infradead.org> References: <1334052213-26870-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1334052213-26870-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:03:30PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > These 3 patches sit on top of my recent series titled: > > [PATCH 0/8] xfs: clean up unit usage in xfs_buf V2 > > These patches remove bits of the API that are effectively the > default behaviour used by everything or are redundant. This just > makes API usage simpler and gives it a smaller footprint to modify > in future. If you touch these interfaces any chance you could kill the impliciy XBF_MAPPED thing we do in various places? Probably best by reversing it and only pass in an XBF_UNMAPPED for the inode buffers as that's the only place where we want them. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs