From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q3DC2jrR036697 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:02:45 -0500 Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id PNVcULA3uHGDpiMU for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 05:02:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 22:02:42 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] xfs: More xfs_buf cleanups Message-ID: <20120413120242.GQ6734@dastard> References: <1334052213-26870-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20120411200821.GK28816@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120411200821.GK28816@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 04:08:22PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:03:30PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > These 3 patches sit on top of my recent series titled: > > > > [PATCH 0/8] xfs: clean up unit usage in xfs_buf V2 > > > > These patches remove bits of the API that are effectively the > > default behaviour used by everything or are redundant. This just > > makes API usage simpler and gives it a smaller footprint to modify > > in future. > > If you touch these interfaces any chance you could kill the impliciy > XBF_MAPPED thing we do in various places? Probably best by reversing > it and only pass in an XBF_UNMAPPED for the inode buffers as that's > the only place where we want them. Sounds like a good idea. I'll write a patch to do this.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs