From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q3TLnIES161935 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:49:19 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id OkliFzVdX4bNoxnA (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:49:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 17:49:17 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 28/37] xfs: move xfsagino_t to xfs_types.h Message-ID: <20120429214917.GG19889@infradead.org> References: <1335160747-17254-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1335160747-17254-29-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1335160747-17254-29-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 03:58:58PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > Untangle the header file includes a bit by moving the definition of > xfs_agino_t to xfs_types.h. This removes the dependency that xfs_ag.h has on > xfs_inum.h, meaning we don't need to include xfs_inum.h everywhere we include > xfs_ag.h. This patch by itself looks good to me, but is there any good reason to keep xfs_inum.h around at all? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs