From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q3UN4bdX046459 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:04:37 -0500 Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id d95FTtw82iIecAZJ for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:04:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 09:04:33 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/37] xfs: current 3.4 patch queue Message-ID: <20120430230433.GM7015@dastard> References: <1335160747-17254-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20120428021546.GI16881@sgi.com> <20120429001439.GN9541@dastard> <20120430144423.GN16881@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120430144423.GN16881@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ben Myers Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 09:44:23AM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:14:39AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 09:15:46PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > > > I'm also testing this patch set them without Jan's work, since I'm not sure when > > > it will be pulled in. Here's the latest: > > > > > > case login: [ 2934.077472] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffc900036a8010 > > > [ 2934.078452] IP: [] xlog_get_lowest_lsn+0x30/0x80 [xfs] > > > [ 2934.078452] PGD 12b029067 PUD 12b02a067 PMD 378f5067 PTE 0 > > > [ 2934.078452] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP > > > [ 2934.078452] CPU 1 > > > [ 2934.078452] Modules linked in: xfs(O) exportfs e1000e [last unloaded: xfs] > > > [ 2934.078452] > > > [ 2934.078452] Pid: 9031, comm: kworker/1:15 Tainted: G O 3.4.0-rc2+ #3 SGI.COM AltixXE310/X7DGT-INF > > > > What out-of-tree module do you have loaded that tainted the kernel? > > The ethernet driver? > > I tend to build xfs out of tree and then 'insmod ./xfs.ko'. Ok, do you rmmod the xfs.ko module and insert new ones, or just reboot whenever you have a new module for testing? I'm assuming that you are unloading and reloading based on the "[last unloaded: xfs]" above. That has always made me nervous about memory corruption intorudced by a previous module affecting the running of a current module.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs