public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix delalloc quota accounting on failure
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 08:35:05 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120508223505.GI5091@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FA92DA7.4090809@sandeen.net>

On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:28:55AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 5/8/12 5:48 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > 
> > xfstest 270 was causing quota reservations way beyond what was sane
> > (ten to hundreds of TB) for a 4GB filesystem. There's a sign problem
> > in the error handling path of xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc() because
> > xfs_trans_unreserve_quota_nblks() simple negates the value passed -
> > which doesn't work for an unsigned variable. This causes
> > reservations of close to 2^32 block instead of removing a
> > reservation of a handful of blocks.
> > 
> > Fix the same problem in the other xfs_trans_unreserve_quota_nblks()
> > callers where unsigned integer variables are used, too.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> Ouch!
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> as far as it goes, but a couple thoughts:
> 
> 1) Should the cast be done in the macro so new callers don't get tripped up?
> 2) Should we just remove the ninos argument from the macro?  It's always passed as 0 (and could potentially suffer the same problem)
> 
> something like:

3) I'm going to remove the problematic macro altogether.

I just wanted to get this fix out there while I look at the other
quota problems I've found. Hint: xfstests _check_quota_usage()
doesn't actually work *at all* on XFS (always passes without
actually checking quotas), and so it has been hiding problems with
either the tests that use it or the quota code for some time....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-08 22:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-08 10:48 [PATCH] xfs: fix delalloc quota accounting on failure Dave Chinner
2012-05-08 14:28 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-05-08 14:38   ` Eric Sandeen
2012-05-08 22:35   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2012-05-08 14:31 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120508223505.GI5091@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox