public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: wu.bo@cn.fujitsu.com, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Test 274 in xfstests
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 22:16:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120515201645.GF26579@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB29C85.5000603@sandeen.net>

On Tue 15-05-12 13:12:21, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 5/15/12 1:05 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> >   Hello,
> > 
> >   test 274 fails e.g. for ext3 because it does not support fallocate(). So
> > I would think the best way to fix the is to add to the test
> >   _require_xfs_io_falloc()
> > so that the test is run only for filesystems which do support fallocate.
> > But with that is connected one slightly related question - why does the
> > test use fallocate(1) binary instead of "xfs_io falloc" command which is
> > more common in xfstests?
> > 
> > 								Honza
> 
> Argh I'm behind.  I had:
> 
> [PATCH V2] xfstests: several 274 fixups
> 
> on the list way too long ago.
> 
> Want to test that out?  It has 1 review on the list, I'll merge it
> soon - if you want to give it a quick test first, go for it :)
  Yup, the patch works for me (since I'm mostly interested in ext3 not
being tested ;). I also reviewed your patch and it looks OK so feel free to
add:
  Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

  Just one comment. Messages like:
echo "Fill fs with 1M IOs; EIO expected" >> $seq.full
  should probably speak of ENOSPC, not EIO, shouldn't they?

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-15 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-15 18:05 Test 274 in xfstests Jan Kara
2012-05-15 18:12 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-05-15 20:16   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2012-05-15 20:18     ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120515201645.GF26579@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=wu.bo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox