public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] xfs: discontiguous buffer support a.k.a. die xfs_dabuf die
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 12:40:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120516174042.GJ16099@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335249220-22274-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

Hey Dave,

Looks like there are some additional test failures due to this patchset.  Here
some output from a bisect I did yesterday, running only the tests which failed
on the machine where I noticed this.

# git describe
v3.4-rc2-54-g1307bbd

from patches/series:
# normal: (there's my baseline on this machine.  I noticed a larger number of test failures on another test box and brought that series over here)
#Failures: 030 178 230 231 232 233 250 274
#Failed 8 of 198 tests

xfs-fix-delalloc-quota-accounting-on-failure.patch
xfs-fix-memory-reclaim-deadlock-on-agi-buffer.patch
xfs-add-trace-points-for-log-forces.patch
xfs-separate-buffer-indexing-from-block-map.patch
xfs-convert-internal-buffer-functions-to-pass-maps.patch
xfs-add-discontiguous-buffer-map-interface.patch
xfs-add-discontiguous-buffer-support-to-transactions.patch

# ^^^ bisect 1, went ok.  
#    030 050 085 086 087 121 128 179 182 200 230 231 232 233 235
#    Failures: 030 230 231 232 233
#    Failed 5 of 15 tests

# ^^^ bisect 4, making sure it's good
#Ran: 030 050 085 086 087 121 128 179 182 200 230 231 232 233 235
#Failures: 030 230 231 232 233
#Failed 5 of 15 tests

xfs-struct-xfs_buf_log_format-isn-t-variable-sized.patch

# ^^^ bisect 5, crashed.  (consistently)

xfs-support-discontiguous-buffers-in-the.patch

# ^^^ bisect 6
#Ran: 030 050 085 086 087 121 128 179 182 200 230 231 232 233 235
#Failures: 030 085 086 087 121 179 182 200 230 231 232 233
#Failed 12 of 15 tests

xfs-use-multiple-irec-xfs-buf-support-in-dabuf.patch

# ^^^ bisect 3, (still no good)
#Ran: 030 050 085 086 087 121 128 179 182 200 230 231 232 233 235
#Failures: 030 085 086 087 121 179 182 200 230 231 232 233
#Failed 12 of 15 tests

#xfs-remove-struct-xfs_dabuf-and-infrastructure.patch
#xfs-factor-buffer-reading-from-xfs_dir2_leaf_getdents.patch
#fs-xfs-xfs_dinode.h-fix-comments-of-xfs_dinode_t.patch
#fix-wrong-flag-assert-in-xfs_attr_shortform_getvalue.patch

# ^^^ bisect 2, not good (I ran only the tests which failed on the other test box)
#    030 050 085 086 087 121 128 179 182 200 230 231 232 233 235
#    Failures: 030 085 086 087 121 179 182 200 230 231 232 233
#    Failed 12 of 15 tests

Looks like there is a problem in
xfs-struct-xfs_buf_log_format-isn-t-variable-sized.patch,
and/or
xfs-support-discontiguous-buffers-in-the.patch.

Regards,
	Ben

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-16 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-24  6:33 [PATCH 00/10] xfs: discontiguous buffer support a.k.a. die xfs_dabuf die Dave Chinner
2012-04-24  6:33 ` [PATCH 01/10] xfs: add trace points for log forces Dave Chinner
2012-04-30 19:25   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-04-24  6:33 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfs: separate buffer indexing from block map Dave Chinner
2012-04-30 19:28   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-04-30 23:24     ` Dave Chinner
2012-05-01 13:16       ` Mark Tinguely
2012-05-02  1:16         ` Dave Chinner
2012-04-24  6:33 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfs: convert internal buffer functions to pass maps Dave Chinner
2012-05-01 15:13   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-04-24  6:33 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: add discontiguous buffer map interface Dave Chinner
2012-05-01 18:10   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-04-24  6:33 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: add discontiguous buffer support to transactions Dave Chinner
2012-05-03 19:41   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-04-24  6:33 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: struct xfs_buf_log_format isn't variable sized Dave Chinner
2012-05-02 13:39   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-04-24  6:33 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: support discontiguous buffers in the xfs_buf_log_item Dave Chinner
2012-05-03 19:42   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-04-24  6:33 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: use multiple irec xfs buf support in dabuf Dave Chinner
2012-05-03 19:43   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-04-24  6:33 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: remove struct xfs_dabuf and infrastructure Dave Chinner
2012-05-04 19:54   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-04-24  6:33 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: factor buffer reading from xfs_dir2_leaf_getdents Dave Chinner
2012-05-04 12:42   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-05-16 17:40 ` Ben Myers [this message]
2012-05-23  9:27   ` [PATCH 00/10] xfs: discontiguous buffer support a.k.a. die xfs_dabuf die Dave Chinner
2012-05-30 14:48     ` Ben Myers
2012-05-30 19:48       ` Ben Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120516174042.GJ16099@sgi.com \
    --to=bpm@sgi.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox