From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q4GHaCWg031939 for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 12:36:13 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 12:40:42 -0500 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] xfs: discontiguous buffer support a.k.a. die xfs_dabuf die Message-ID: <20120516174042.GJ16099@sgi.com> References: <1335249220-22274-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1335249220-22274-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hey Dave, Looks like there are some additional test failures due to this patchset. Here some output from a bisect I did yesterday, running only the tests which failed on the machine where I noticed this. # git describe v3.4-rc2-54-g1307bbd from patches/series: # normal: (there's my baseline on this machine. I noticed a larger number of test failures on another test box and brought that series over here) #Failures: 030 178 230 231 232 233 250 274 #Failed 8 of 198 tests xfs-fix-delalloc-quota-accounting-on-failure.patch xfs-fix-memory-reclaim-deadlock-on-agi-buffer.patch xfs-add-trace-points-for-log-forces.patch xfs-separate-buffer-indexing-from-block-map.patch xfs-convert-internal-buffer-functions-to-pass-maps.patch xfs-add-discontiguous-buffer-map-interface.patch xfs-add-discontiguous-buffer-support-to-transactions.patch # ^^^ bisect 1, went ok. # 030 050 085 086 087 121 128 179 182 200 230 231 232 233 235 # Failures: 030 230 231 232 233 # Failed 5 of 15 tests # ^^^ bisect 4, making sure it's good #Ran: 030 050 085 086 087 121 128 179 182 200 230 231 232 233 235 #Failures: 030 230 231 232 233 #Failed 5 of 15 tests xfs-struct-xfs_buf_log_format-isn-t-variable-sized.patch # ^^^ bisect 5, crashed. (consistently) xfs-support-discontiguous-buffers-in-the.patch # ^^^ bisect 6 #Ran: 030 050 085 086 087 121 128 179 182 200 230 231 232 233 235 #Failures: 030 085 086 087 121 179 182 200 230 231 232 233 #Failed 12 of 15 tests xfs-use-multiple-irec-xfs-buf-support-in-dabuf.patch # ^^^ bisect 3, (still no good) #Ran: 030 050 085 086 087 121 128 179 182 200 230 231 232 233 235 #Failures: 030 085 086 087 121 179 182 200 230 231 232 233 #Failed 12 of 15 tests #xfs-remove-struct-xfs_dabuf-and-infrastructure.patch #xfs-factor-buffer-reading-from-xfs_dir2_leaf_getdents.patch #fs-xfs-xfs_dinode.h-fix-comments-of-xfs_dinode_t.patch #fix-wrong-flag-assert-in-xfs_attr_shortform_getvalue.patch # ^^^ bisect 2, not good (I ran only the tests which failed on the other test box) # 030 050 085 086 087 121 128 179 182 200 230 231 232 233 235 # Failures: 030 085 086 087 121 179 182 200 230 231 232 233 # Failed 12 of 15 tests Looks like there is a problem in xfs-struct-xfs_buf_log_format-isn-t-variable-sized.patch, and/or xfs-support-discontiguous-buffers-in-the.patch. Regards, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs