From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q4I9blaX118059 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 04:37:47 -0500 Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.131]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id AtLUw6Afzi8P0vPw for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 02:37:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 19:37:43 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: Still seeing hangs in xlog_grant_log_space Message-ID: <20120518093743.GV25351@dastard> References: <20120426230738.GB9541@dastard> <20120427110922.GF9541@dastard> <20120507225944.GA5091@dastard> <20120509073507.GQ5091@dastard> <4FAADCA8.6030702@sgi.com> <4FAB237D.5050608@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FAB237D.5050608@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Mark Tinguely Cc: Juerg Haefliger , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:10:05PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: > On 05/09/12 16:07, Mark Tinguely wrote: > > I notice in the trace_report_180secs.txt file, lsn (ail_push and the > ungrants) displays are not correct. It acts like the BLOCK_LSN() is > shifting too much. What do you mean by "not correct"? > Block sequence numbers never make it too far > above 1100 before incrementing the cycle. I think the problem is the > trace not the sequence numbers. The log is only 576 filesystem blocks (which are 1k in size) long, which means 1152 sectors, so the LSN block number portion will never go above 1152. It looks correct to me.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs