From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q4MNOSua029878 for ; Tue, 22 May 2012 18:24:28 -0500 Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id AnQ1CXFiGs5ZLoHz for ; Tue, 22 May 2012 16:24:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 09:24:24 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prefix IO_XX flags with XFS_IO_XX to avoid namespace colision. Message-ID: <20120522232424.GK25351@dastard> References: <4fbbfd75.nYwhMRRjLSAq0x8u%arenaud@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4fbbfd75.nYwhMRRjLSAq0x8u%arenaud@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Alain Renaud Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 03:56:21PM -0500, Alain Renaud wrote: > > This mod simply add a XFS_ prefix to IO_DIRECT,XFS_IO_DELALLOC, > XFS_IO_UNWRITTEN and XFS_IO_OVERWRITE. This to avoid namespace conflict > with other modules. While I don't see any problems with making the change, I don't see exactly how we could have a namespace clash here given they are internal to XFS, not very widely included and have beenthis way for years. What is the namespace clash you are seeing/caring about? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs