From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id
	q4U7gEeJ165547 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Wed, 30 May 2012 02:42:14 -0500
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org
	(173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net
	[173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id
	pxfpd0pwwcmSlkvs (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256
	verify=NO) for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>;
	Wed, 30 May 2012 00:42:07 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 03:42:04 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests 016: Do not discard blocks at the mkfs time,
	more verbose version
Message-ID: <20120530074204.GA17567@infradead.org>
References: <1319625983.3074.28.camel@dhcp-26-208.brq.redhat.com>
	<be02ada1-aee5-406d-84cd-d54dde7ae871@zmail16.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
	<20111028095354.GA1062@infradead.org> <4FC4FF47.50606@sandeen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4FC4FF47.50606@sandeen.net>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Boris Ranto <branto@redhat.com>, xfs <xfs@oss.sgi.com>

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:54:31AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Seems this one got lost; we should still merge it, yes?

Please do.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs