From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id
	q5IDXQZq187335 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 08:33:28 -0500
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org
	(173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net
	[173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id
	iwmhmwe4JqOUWZY8 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256
	verify=NO) for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>;
	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 06:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat
	Linux)) id 1Sgc55-0003Ce-IJ
	for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 13:33:23 +0000
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:33:23 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: wiki spam
Message-ID: <20120618133323.GA11845@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com

I just had to delete dozends of link farm spam entries on the xfs.org.

This is getting a bit out of control, so I'm wondring what we can do
about it.

I wonder if it's reasonable only to hand out account if a user manually
contacts one of the admins.  I don't want the bar high, just proving
to be able to writing a human person mail basically.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs