From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q5JFxn4S116740 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:59:49 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:59:46 -0500 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] xfs: convert internal buffer functions to pass maps Message-ID: <20120619155946.GA2676@sgi.com> References: <1339133914-11148-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1339133914-11148-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20120618204325.GX4721@sgi.com> <20120618210713.GY4721@sgi.com> <20120619071552.GA23093@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120619071552.GA23093@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hey Christoph, On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 03:15:53AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 04:07:13PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > > Ah.. it's Christoph's inode allocator refactoring. Ok then. > > The inode allocator changes need a small redo anyway, so let's > concentrate on dave's buffer cache bits thay have been pending for a > long time. I'll try to find some time to review them soon, too. How long before the inode allocator redo? Maybe it would be best if Dave's buffer cache changes are rebased not to depend upon the inode allocator changes? -Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs