From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q5JHBtlg127936 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:11:55 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:11:53 -0500 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] xfs: convert internal buffer functions to pass maps Message-ID: <20120619171153.GD2676@sgi.com> References: <1339133914-11148-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1339133914-11148-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20120618204325.GX4721@sgi.com> <20120618210713.GY4721@sgi.com> <20120619071552.GA23093@infradead.org> <20120619155946.GA2676@sgi.com> <20120619170304.GC7554@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120619170304.GC7554@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hey Christoph, On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:03:05PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:59:46AM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > > How long before the inode allocator redo? Maybe it would be best if Dave's > > buffer cache changes are rebased not to depend upon the inode allocator > > changes? > > I'll need some time to get back to it. I'd rather like to get the > buffer changes in ASAP as a lot of work depends on them. In that case I think we'll be able to get the buffer changes in more quickly if they are rebased not to require the inode allocator patchset. I think that Jan is also going to repost his 'Fix overallocation in xfs_buf_allocate_memory()' based upon Dave's suggestions. It's best not to depend upon that either. What do you say, Dave? -Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs