From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q5K6U2pX248679 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 01:30:02 -0500 Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.141]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id GZeac837QEKbem8Z for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 23:30:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:29:31 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] xfs: convert internal buffer functions to pass maps Message-ID: <20120620062931.GC30705@dastard> References: <1339133914-11148-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1339133914-11148-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20120618204325.GX4721@sgi.com> <20120618210713.GY4721@sgi.com> <20120619071552.GA23093@infradead.org> <20120619155946.GA2676@sgi.com> <20120619170304.GC7554@infradead.org> <20120619171153.GD2676@sgi.com> <20120620055619.GA30705@dastard> <20120620060400.GA5617@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120620060400.GA5617@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Ben Myers , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:04:00AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 03:56:19PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > they are rebased not to require the inode allocator patchset. I think that Jan > > > is also going to repost his 'Fix overallocation in xfs_buf_allocate_memory()' > > > based upon Dave's suggestions. It's best not to depend upon that either. What > > > do you say, Dave? > > > > I reorder my local patch set and repost it after running it through > > some testing.... > > Sorry, I totally misunderstood the initial issue - I though Ben had my > series applied, and thus yours didn't apply. No, other way around ;) But I'm going to leave Jan kara's buffer cache over-allocation bug fix ahead my list, because that has to go into 3.5-rcX as it is a regression fix.... FWIW, Ben, there's a few reviewed bug fixes on the list that are outstanding that need to go to Linus ASAP: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-06/msg00154.html http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-06/msg00134.html http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-06/msg00056.html (regression) Can you take care of them please? > I still think reordering is better - I'm quite busy and I'd rather get > your series reviewed first before redoing and retesting the inode > allocator changes. > > In fact I'll start reviewing them in about 10 minutes after I've > finished catching up on email for this morning. Cool. I'm just rebasing right now.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs