From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q5K7qLeq001867 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 02:52:21 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 03:52:16 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] types.h: implement intptr_t and uintptr_t Message-ID: <20120620075216.GA24798@infradead.org> References: <1338487534-14575-1-git-send-email-jengelh@inai.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1338487534-14575-1-git-send-email-jengelh@inai.de> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: hch@infradead.org, joe@perches.com, bpm@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com I'd really like to get Jans type cleanups in XFS in for the next merge window. Given the lack of feedback on lkml in favor or against (u)intptr_t I'm tempted to add them to xfs_linux.h for now, and then do another push to propagate them to kernel-wide types later. Is that fine with everybody? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs