From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q5KGZwAo107228 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:35:58 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:36:08 -0500 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] types.h: implement intptr_t and uintptr_t Message-ID: <20120620163608.GA10196@sgi.com> References: <1338487534-14575-1-git-send-email-jengelh@inai.de> <20120620075216.GA24798@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120620075216.GA24798@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: joe@perches.com, Jan Engelhardt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Hey Christoph, On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 03:52:16AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I'd really like to get Jans type cleanups in XFS in for the next > merge window. Given the lack of feedback on lkml in favor or > against (u)intptr_t I'm tempted to add them to xfs_linux.h for now, > and then do another push to propagate them to kernel-wide types later. > > Is that fine with everybody? That's fine with me. But maybe there will be some feedback. There is still some time before the merge window. -Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs