From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q5RHiqbT223293 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:44:53 -0500 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:44:48 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: cleanup the mount options Message-ID: <20120627174448.GA3278@infradead.org> References: <1340816243-6177-1-git-send-email-gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1340816243-6177-1-git-send-email-gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Wanlong Gao Cc: hch@infradead.org, bpm@sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:57:23AM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote: > remove the mount options macro, use tokens instead. > Futher cleanup will use xfs_*_opt in xfs instead, > but it may be hard to be merged in one patch. Thanks a lot! I like the use of the option parse a lot, this has been long overdue. But is there any good reason to add the xfs_*_opt macros? They make reading and especially grepping the code a lot harder, so there better be a good reason for them. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs