public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xfs: re-enable xfsaild idle mode and fix associated races
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 10:07:12 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120702000712.GN19223@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340880776-45730-1-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 06:52:56AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> xfsaild idle mode logic currently leads to a couple hangs:
> 
> 1.) If xfsaild is rescheduled in during an incremental scan
>     (i.e., tout != 0) and the target has been updated since
>     the previous run, we can hit the new target and go into
>     idle mode with a still populated ail.
> 2.) A wake up is only issued when the target is pushed forward.
>     The wake up can race with xfsaild if it is currently in the
>     process of entering idle mode, causing future wake up
>     events to be lost.
> 
> These hangs have been reproduced and verified as fixed by
> running xfstests 273 in a loop on a slightly modified upstream
> kernel. The kernel is modified to re-enable idle mode as
> previously implemented (when count == 0) and with a revert of
> commit 670ce93f, which includes performance improvements that
> make this harder to reproduce.
> 
> The solution, the algorithm for which has been outlined by
> Dave Chinner, is to modify xfsaild to enter idle mode only when
> the ail is empty and the push target has not been moved forward
> since the last push.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>

Looks OK to me, and hasn't caused any problems here.

Final question - did you confirm with powertop that the xfsaild is
no longer causing wakeups a minute or two after you stop writing to
the filesystem? (I haven't yet)

Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-02  0:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-28 10:52 [PATCH v3] xfs: re-enable xfsaild idle mode and fix associated races Brian Foster
2012-07-02  0:07 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2012-07-02 13:33   ` Brian Foster
2012-07-02 23:51     ` Dave Chinner
2012-07-03 13:13       ` Brian Foster
2012-07-03 16:07         ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-02  7:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-02  8:29   ` Dave Chinner
2012-07-02 13:51     ` Brian Foster
2012-07-17  7:00       ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-24 13:22         ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-24 14:54           ` Ben Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120702000712.GN19223@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox