From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q635rVam061214 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 00:53:32 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id vZjER8WAzDqmkO3j for ; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 22:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 01:53:24 -0400 From: Mike Snitzer Subject: Re: xfs_btree_cur leak with 3.5-rc4 Message-ID: <20120703055324.GA7129@redhat.com> References: <20120702191412.GA3617@redhat.com> <20120703002611.GW19223@dastard> <20120703012628.GA5710@redhat.com> <20120703032136.GZ19223@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120703032136.GZ19223@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Jul 02 2012 at 11:21pm -0400, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 09:26:28PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 02 2012 at 8:26pm -0400, > > Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 03:14:12PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > > > I get kmemleak reports against XFS when I run the thinp-test-suite > > > > against 3.5-rc4. I didn't see any XFS leaks with 3.4. > > > > > > Already fixed in 3.5-rc5: > > > > > > 76d0953 xfs: fix allocbt cursor leak in xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_near > > > > Odd, I already have that fix (as it was included in 3.5-rc4). > > I misread the git describe as saying it was included after -rc4. My > mistake. That indicates that the above fix wasn't quite correct... > > Try the patch below. Looks good. Thanks. Tested-by: Mike Snitzer _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs