From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q648XuIo186501 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 03:33:56 -0500 Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.131]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id VHz2u2zWceg5lZFn for ; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 01:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 18:33:53 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: implement ->update_time Message-ID: <20120704083353.GH19223@dastard> References: <20120606210128.GA12819@infradead.org> <20120704060606.GA7333@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120704060606.GA7333@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 02:06:06AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > ping? > > On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 05:01:28PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Use this new method to replace our hacky use of ->dirty_inode. An additional > > benefit is that we can now propagate errors up the stack. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig I've been testing it and haven't had any problems with it - I just haven't done a final review of it yet. I'll try to do it tomorrow morning.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs