From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q6C8OdJB025959 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 03:24:40 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 04:24:33 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] xfs: regression fixes for 3.5-rc7 Message-ID: <20120712082433.GA5553@infradead.org> References: <1342042843-1773-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20120711224822.GQ10196@sgi.com> <20120711235227.GA19223@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120711235227.GA19223@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Ben Myers , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 09:52:27AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > IMO we should also consider "xfs: prevent recursion in xfs_buf_iorequest", from > > Christoph. > > Yes, I think so. You don't have to wait for me to propose fixes to > suggest other patches that could be considered for Linus updates... ;) I'm pretty sure I suggesteds these specificly for 3.5-rc. Note that Linus is going to release 3.5 soon, so we should rush to both get the 3.5 fixes and the remaining 3.6 queue in. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs