public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
To: "konrad.wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, shaggy <shaggy@kernel.org>,
	"chris.mason" <chris.mason@fusionio.com>,
	elder <elder@kernel.org>, tytso <tytso@mit.edu>,
	ocfs2-devel <ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com>,
	mfasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	xfs <xfs@oss.sgi.com>, bpm <bpm@sgi.com>,
	"adilger.kernel" <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	jfs-discussion <jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	jlbec <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Set bi_rw when alloc bio before call bio_add_page.
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 08:42:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201207310842549068542@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20120730153935.GE4547@phenom.dumpdata.com

On 2012-07-30 23:39 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 03:14:28PM +0800, majianpeng wrote:
>> When exec bio_alloc, the bi_rw is zero.But after calling bio_add_page,
>
>What about submit_bio? That sets the bi_rw as well?
>> it will use bi_rw.
>> Fox example, in functiion __bio_add_page,it will call merge_bvec_fn().
>
>function.
>> The merge_bvec_fn of raid456 will use the bi_rw to judge the merge.
>> >> if ((bvm->bi_rw & 1) == WRITE)
>> >> return biovec->bv_len; /* always allow writes to be mergeable */
>
>So what does that mean? Without this patch what happens?
>
Because bio_alloc, the bi_rw is zero default.But in __bio_add_page, it used bi_rw.
For example: if merge_bvce_fn used bi_rw, but the bi_rw is wrong(if bi_rw is not zero).
So the result may be error.
>> 
>> 
>> Jianpeng Ma (8):
>
>Can you collapse all of this in just one patch?
Sorry, I think those files are not a subsystem.So i should send separately.
>
>>   Evalue bio->bi_rw after calling bio_alloc() and before calling
>
>It is 'evaluate'
>>     bio_add_page().
>>   Evalue bio->bi_rw after calling bio_alloc() and before calling    
>>     bio_add_page().
>>   Evalue bio->bi_rw after calling bio_alloc() and before calling    
>>     bio_add_page().
>>   Evalue bio->bi_rw after calling bio_alloc() and before calling    
>>     bio_add_page().
>>   Evalue bio->bi_rw after calling bio_alloc() and before calling    
>>     bio_add_page().
>>   Evalue bio->bi_rw after calling bio_alloc() and before calling    
>>     bio_add_page().
>>   Evalue bio->bi_rw after calling bio_alloc() and before calling    
>>     bio_add_page().
>>   Evalue bio->bi_rw after calling bio_alloc() and before calling    
>>     bio_add_page().
>> 
>>  block/blk-lib.c                     |    1 +
>>  drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c |    1 +
>
>I am not really sure if that is correct. Does 'submit_bio' not do the
>job properly?
Before call submit_bio, it call bio_add_page.
>
>>  fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c          |    1 +
>>  fs/direct-io.c                      |    1 +
>>  fs/ext4/page-io.c                   |    1 +
>>  fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c               |    1 +
>>  fs/ocfs2/cluster/heartbeat.c        |    8 +++++---
>>  fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c                   |    2 ++
>>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c                    |    1 +
>>  9 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> -- 
>> 1.7.9.5
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-31  0:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-30  7:14 [PATCH 0/8] Set bi_rw when alloc bio before call bio_add_page majianpeng
2012-07-30 15:39 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-31  0:42   ` majianpeng [this message]
2012-07-30 21:42 ` Dave Chinner
2012-07-31  0:55   ` majianpeng
2012-07-31  1:14     ` Dave Chinner
2012-08-10 15:23       ` Muthu Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201207310842549068542@gmail.com \
    --to=majianpeng@gmail.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bpm@sgi.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@fusionio.com \
    --cc=elder@kernel.org \
    --cc=jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=shaggy@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox