From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q72NVXCO254878 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 18:31:34 -0500 Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ObKNC9MJinhNpTG9 for ; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 16:31:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 09:31:31 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: xfs_db: bug in bmap command? Message-ID: <20120802233131.GQ2877@dastard> References: <501AFCF1.70804@sandeen.net> <501AFE80.40709@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <501AFE80.40709@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Peter Watkins , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 05:26:08PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 8/2/12 5:19 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > On 8/1/12 10:17 AM, Peter Watkins wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> If you have a moment would you be kind enough to review the test case > >> and patch below? > >> > >> I ran into this while using xfs_db to dump extents for a large, > >> fragmented file. The extents were stored in btree form. > > > > The xfs_db change looks right. > > (and I'll merge it, Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen ) Not so fast! Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs