From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Cc: jeff.liu@oracle.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] xfs: Introduce a new function to find the desired type of offset from page cache
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:28:41 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120809232840.GB2877@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5023CC01.3060201@sgi.com>
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 09:41:05AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
.....
> >+
> >+ /*
> >+ * At lease we found one page. If this is the first time we
> >+ * step into the loop, and if the first page index offset is
> >+ * greater than the given search offset, a hole was found.
> >+ */
> >+ if (type == HOLE_OFF&& lastoff == startoff&&
> >+ lastoff< page_offset(pvec.pages[0])) {
> >+ found = true;
> >+ break;
> >+ }
>
> I played with the code and appreciate the trickiness of the startoff.
> I this can be refined a bit more. see below.
>
> >+
> >+ for (i = 0; i< nr_pages; i++) {
> >+ struct page *page = pvec.pages[i];
> >+ loff_t b_offset;
> >+
> >+ /*
> >+ * Page index is out of range, searching done.
> >+ * If the current offset is not reaches the end
> >+ * of the specified search range, there should
> >+ * be a hole between them.
> >+ */
> >+ if (page->index> end) {
> >+ if (type == HOLE_OFF&& lastoff< endoff) {
> >+ *offset = lastoff;
> >+ found = true;
> >+ }
> >+ goto out;
> >+ }
>
> Before we take the lock, we can check to see if the page starts
> later than expected (a hole). The pre-loop start check can be
> removed and something like the follow added:
Really, we don't need to be that tricky or smart. This is not a
performance critical operation, so we don't need to optimise away
page locks, especially when the risk of getting it wrong is
compromising data integrity...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-09 23:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-03 6:10 [PATCH v6 2/4] xfs: Introduce a new function to find the desired type of offset from page cache Jeff Liu
2012-08-09 14:41 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-08-09 23:28 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2012-08-10 8:02 ` Jie Liu
2012-08-10 8:27 ` Jie Liu
2012-08-09 23:24 ` Dave Chinner
2012-08-10 8:13 ` Jie Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120809232840.GB2877@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jeff.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=tinguely@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox