From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q7ELaWYS010788 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:36:33 -0500 Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id J0qGzFf7kf8vFzFk for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:36:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:36:29 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] xfs: check for possible overflow in xfs_ioc_trim Message-ID: <20120814213629.GL2877@dastard> References: <1344933304-16014-1-git-send-email-tracek@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1344933304-16014-1-git-send-email-tracek@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Tomas Racek Cc: lczerner@redhat.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:35:04AM +0200, Tomas Racek wrote: > If range.start or range.minlen is bigger than filesystem size, return > invalid value error. This fixes possible overflow in BTOBB macro when > passed value was nearly ULLONG_MAX. > > Signed-off-by: Tomas Racek looks ok to me. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs