From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q7HCNVLT034708 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:23:31 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 7K4wIC0flksy87kn (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 05:23:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:23:29 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: minor inode64 mount option cleanup Message-ID: <20120817122329.GB2502@infradead.org> References: <501943B5.4030309@inktank.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <501943B5.4030309@inktank.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Alex Elder Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com > @@ -295,12 +295,13 @@ xfs_parseargs( > } > dswidth = simple_strtoul(value, &eov, 10); > } else if (!strcmp(this_char, MNTOPT_64BITINODE)) { > +#if XFS_BIG_INUMS > mp->m_flags &= ~XFS_MOUNT_SMALL_INUMS; > -#if !XFS_BIG_INUMS > +#else /* !XFS_BIG_INUMS */ Looks good for now, but in the long run I'd prefer thast XFS simplify requires 64-bit block numbers like gfs2 as there's not too much of a point using it in a super-constrained envrionment and we could kill all the XFS_BIG_INUMS conditionals, as well as the types that are different based on the in-memory block number size. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs