From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q7RIGtPv228101 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:16:56 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id f1OdDHW00tx0E90D (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:17:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:17:42 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 020/102] xfs: warn if direct reclaim tries to writeback pages Message-ID: <20120827181742.GA13970@infradead.org> References: <1345698180-13612-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1345698180-13612-21-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1345698180-13612-21-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Mel Gorman , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 03:01:38PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Mel Gorman > > Upstream commit: 94054fa3fca1fd78db02cb3d68d5627120f0a1d4 > > Direct reclaim should never writeback pages. For now, handle the > situation and warn about it. Ultimately, this will be a BUG_ON. Is this actually the case on 3.0-stable? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs