From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q7SI1IMr130162 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:01:18 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:02:07 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/18] xfstests: move tests out of top level Message-ID: <20120828180207.GA18356@infradead.org> References: <1343294892-20991-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <5032ABBD.80504@sgi.com> <20120820224306.GF19235@dastard> <20120821163337.GC29979@sgi.com> <20120821220926.GP19235@dastard> <20120822191642.GF29979@sgi.com> <20120822234219.GR19235@dastard> <20120823170025.GG29979@sgi.com> <20120824040724.GA19235@dastard> <20120828174304.GB3274@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120828174304.GB3274@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ben Myers Cc: Mark Tinguely , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:43:04PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > I got the impression that Christoph is doing a review of this patch set as > well. If you wait for Christoph's review before moving bench it will give Phil > a little time to come up with a plan for discussion. I'll try to get to it quickly. I shared Dave's opinion on the current bench code, but I also agree that if SGI has it in use right now we can't remove it. I'm still not quite clear if you guys use it right now or just maybe plan to use it real soon. If it's the latter I'd be in favour of removing it, if not we must keep it. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs