From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q7SJtiMV142483 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:55:44 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id kDmHojZ0sW2nCKgP (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:56:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:56:34 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] xfstests: rename USE_BIG_LOOPFS to be more generic Message-ID: <20120828195634.GB22845@infradead.org> References: <1343291989-14987-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1343291989-14987-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1343291989-14987-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 06:39:41PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > USE_BIG_LOOPFS is really misnamed - it can be used on real devices just as > easily as loop devices. It really means we are testing a large scratch device > and that we should enable the special filesystem filling and checking options > that enable xfstests to be run sanely on large XFS filesystems. Looks fine, even if I don't like the new name too much either. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs