From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q7UCEUEx195115 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 07:14:30 -0500 Received: from mail.ud10.udmedia.de (ud10.udmedia.de [194.117.254.50]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id QsmNDJkaHp1tgFUj (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 05:15:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:15:16 +0200 From: Markus Trippelsdorf Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/13] xfs: remove the xfssyncd mess Message-ID: <20120830121516.GA285@x4> References: <1346328017-2795-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1346328017-2795-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 2012.08.30 at 22:00 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > Version 2 of the patchset I described here: > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-06/msg00064.html > > This version has run through xfstests completely once, so it's > less likely to let smoke out.... Is there a publicly accessible git tree available where one could pull from? (This would be way easier than saving and hand-applying 13 patches.) -- Markus _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs