From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q81NCkSV195254 for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 18:12:46 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id HBR4sW9e6Fg5lght (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 16:13:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 19:13:38 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: 3.5.2: moving files from xfs/disk -> nfs: radix_tree_lookup_slot+0xe/0x10 Message-ID: <20120901231338.GE6896@infradead.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Justin Piszcz Cc: linux-m@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com I'd suspect it's something with the actual radix tree code, Ccing linux-mm in case they know more. On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:00:10AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote: > Hi, > > Moving ~276GB of files (mainly large backups) and everything has > seemed to lockup on the client moving data to the server, it is still > in this state.. > > [75716.705697] INFO: task sync:8790 blocked for more than 120 seconds. > [75716.705701] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" > disables this message. > [75716.705703] sync D ffff88040ec54830 0 8790 2141 0x00000000 > [75716.705708] ffff88001fff1d08 0000000000000086 ffffffff81862fc0 > ffff88001fff1fd8 > [75716.705713] ffff88001fff1fd8 0000000000004000 ffff88041d958670 > ffff88040ec54830 > [75716.705716] ffff88001fff1c38 ffffffff812dcaee ffff88001fff1c58 > ffff88001fff1d78 > [75716.705720] Call Trace: > [75716.705729] [] ? radix_tree_lookup_slot+0xe/0x10 > [75716.705733] [] ? find_get_pages_tag+0xc6/0x150 > [75716.705738] [] ? __enqueue_entity+0x70/0x80 > [75716.705742] [] ? __sync_filesystem+0x90/0x90 > [75716.705747] [] schedule+0x24/0x70 > [75716.705751] [] schedule_timeout+0x1a9/0x210 > [75716.705755] [] ? calc_period_shift+0x60/0x60 > [75716.705760] [] ? check_preempt_curr+0x75/0xa0 > [75716.705764] [] wait_for_common+0xc0/0x150 > [75716.705767] [] ? try_to_wake_up+0x280/0x280 > [75716.705770] [] ? __sync_filesystem+0x90/0x90 > [75716.705773] [] wait_for_completion+0x18/0x20 > [75716.705777] [] writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x77/0xa0 > [75716.705782] [] ? > shrink_dcache_for_umount_subtree+0x111/0x1d0 > [75716.705785] [] writeback_inodes_sb+0x29/0x40 > [75716.705788] [] __sync_filesystem+0x47/0x90 > [75716.705791] [] sync_one_sb+0x1b/0x20 > [75716.705795] [] iterate_supers+0xe1/0xf0 > [75716.705798] [] sys_sync+0x2b/0x60 > [75716.705802] [] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f > [75836.701197] INFO: task sync:8790 blocked for more than 120 seconds. > > Thoughts? > > Justin. > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ---end quoted text--- _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs