From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] xfs: add FREE_EOFBLOCKS ioctl
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 15:17:43 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120903051742.GS15292@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346097111-4476-4-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 03:51:50PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> The XFS_IOC_FREE_EOFBLOCKS ioctl allows users to invoke an EOFBLOCKS
> scan. The xfs_eofblocks structure is defined to support the command
> parameters (quota type/id and minimum file size).
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_fs.h | 10 ++++++++++
> fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/xfs/xfs_quota.h | 1 +
> fs/xfs/xfs_quotaops.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_fs.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_fs.h
> index c13fed8..6f93db9 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_fs.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_fs.h
> @@ -339,6 +339,15 @@ typedef struct xfs_error_injection {
>
>
> /*
> + * Speculative preallocation trimming.
> + */
> +typedef struct xfs_eofblocks {
> + __u32 id; /* quota id */
> + __u32 qtype; /* quota type */
> + __u64 min_file_size; /* minimum file size */
> +} xfs_eofblocks_t;
No typedefs.
Additionally: this is a user facing API for functionality that has
wider potential use than quota. For example, xfs_fsr runs out of
space in an AG, but it really wants to put a file there, so it calls
XFS_IOC_FREE_EOFBLOCKS to specify the AG it wants all the prealloc
removed from.
So, the structure needs a version number so the kernel knows what
fields the application is aware of, a flags field to say what
operation is being done (i.e. flush by projid) rather than a "qtype"
and a bunch of padding so that we can add new elements to it as need
arises without breaking existing user binaries.
> * ioctl commands that replace IRIX syssgi()'s
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> index 0e0232c..b91cbcd 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> @@ -1602,6 +1602,31 @@ xfs_file_ioctl(
> error = xfs_errortag_clearall(mp, 1);
> return -error;
>
> + case XFS_IOC_FREE_EOFBLOCKS: {
> + struct xfs_eofblocks eofb;
> + int qtype;
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(&eofb, arg, sizeof(eofb)))
> + return -XFS_ERROR(EFAULT);
> +
> + qtype = xfs_quota_type(eofb.qtype);
> +
> + /*
> + * TODO: The filtering code currently uses the id in the inode.
> + * Therefore, I don't think it really matters whether the
> + * particular quota type is enabled (and the dquot is attached).
> + *
> + * Alternatively, we could filter by dquot type. This would
> + * mean we might have to make sure dquot's are attached during
> + * the scan and that the particular quota type is enabled. I'm
> + * not sure that this buys us anything.
> + */
If quota is not enabled, then a request to free blocks determined by
a quota ID is invalid and should be rejected. It's a user API - what
is and isn't supported needs to be written down in black and white
(i.e. in the xfsctl man page).
> + /* TODO: might want to just use the eofb structure here */
> + error = xfs_inodes_free_eofblocks(mp, qtype, eofb.id, eofb.min_file_size, EOFBLOCKS_WAIT);
Yes, just pass the structure - it means it can be passed all the way
down to the execute function, and only that code needs to handle
different versions of the structure.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-03 5:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-27 19:51 [RFC PATCH 0/4] xfs: add support for tracking inodes with post-EOF speculative preallocation Brian Foster
2012-08-27 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] xfs: add EOFBLOCKS inode tagging/untagging Brian Foster
2012-09-03 4:20 ` Dave Chinner
2012-08-27 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] xfs: create function to scan and clear EOFBLOCKS inodes Brian Foster
2012-09-03 5:06 ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-04 14:10 ` Brian Foster
2012-09-05 6:42 ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-05 12:22 ` Brian Foster
2012-08-27 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] xfs: add FREE_EOFBLOCKS ioctl Brian Foster
2012-09-03 5:17 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2012-09-04 14:10 ` Brian Foster
2012-09-05 6:49 ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-05 12:22 ` Brian Foster
2012-08-27 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] xfs: add background scanning to clear EOFBLOCKS inodes Brian Foster
2012-09-03 5:28 ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-04 14:10 ` Brian Foster
2012-09-05 7:00 ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-05 12:22 ` Brian Foster
2012-09-05 23:43 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120903051742.GS15292@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox