From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q8808v7S248929 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:08:57 -0500 Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id yIlh1xqa2SOTvGh4 for ; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 10:09:54 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] xfstests: make 275 pass Message-ID: <20120908000954.GW15292@dastard> References: <4F04A6E6.1090304@redhat.com> <4F04BC81.1000207@redhat.com> <20120104231725.GB24466@dastard> <4F207079.6050401@sandeen.net> <504A5176.5020302@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <504A5176.5020302@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Eric Sandeen , ext4 development , Eryu Guan , Zach Brown , xfs-oss On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 02:56:38PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 1/25/12 3:13 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > Ok, this is a significant rework of 275, which made too many > > assumptions about details of space usage and failed on several > > filesystems (it passed on xfs, but only by accident). > > > > This new version tries to leave about 256k free, then tries > > a single 1M IO, and fails only if 0 bytes are written. > > > > It also sends a lot more to $seq.full for debugging on failure > > and fixes a few other stylistic things. > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen > > --- > > Poor Zach ran into this one again. Can I get a review of this > version, and I'll merge it if it looks good? Looks OK. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs