From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] xfs: create helper to check whether to free eofblocks on inode
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:27:43 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120911052743.GB11511@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1347302246-52710-4-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 02:37:21PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> This check is used in multiple places to determine whether we
> should check for (and potentially free) post EOF blocks on an
> inode. Add a helper to consolidate the check.
>
> Note that when we remove an inode from the cache (xfs_inactive()),
> we are required to trim post-EOF blocks even if the inode is marked
> preallocated or append-only to maintain correct space accounting.
> The 'force' parameter to xfs_can_free_eofblocks() specifies whether
> we should ignore the prealloc/append-only status of the inode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Just quickly, I'd rewrite this convoluted logic:
> +/*
> + * Test whether it is appropriate to check an inode for and free post EOF
> + * blocks. The 'force' parameter determines whether we should also consider
> + * regular files that are marked preallocated or append-only.
> + */
> +static inline bool
> +xfs_can_free_eofblocks(struct xfs_inode *ip, bool force)
> +{
> + if (S_ISREG(ip->i_d.di_mode) &&
> + (VFS_I(ip)->i_size > 0 ||
> + (VN_CACHED(VFS_I(ip)) > 0 || ip->i_delayed_blks > 0)) &&
> + (ip->i_df.if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS) &&
> + (!(ip->i_d.di_flags & (XFS_DIFLAG_PREALLOC | XFS_DIFLAG_APPEND)) ||
> + (force && ip->i_delayed_blks != 0)))
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
in a manner that can means it no longer has to be analysed from first principles
every time it is read. e.g.:
static inline bool
xfs_can_free_eofblocks(struct xfs_inode *ip, bool force)
{
/* prealloc/delalloc exists only on regular files */
if (!S_ISREG(ip->i_d.di_mode))
return false;
/*
* Zero sized files with no cached page or delalloc blocks will not have
* any speculative prealloc/delalloc to remove.
*/
if (VFS_I(ip)->i_size == 0 &&
VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping->nr_pages == 0 &&
ip->i_delayed_blks == 0)
return false;
/* If we haven't read in the extent list, then don't do it now. */
if (!(ip->i_df.if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS))
return false;
/*
* Real preallocation or append only files do not get EOF blocks freed
* unless there are also delalloc blocks and we are forced to remove
* them.
*/
if ((ip->i_d.di_flags & (XFS_DIFLAG_PREALLOC | XFS_DIFLAG_APPEND)) {
if (!ip->i_delayed_blks)
return false;
if (!force)
return false;
}
return true;
}
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-11 5:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-10 18:37 [PATCH v2 0/8] speculative preallocation inode tracking Brian Foster
2012-09-10 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] xfs: add EOFBLOCKS inode tagging/untagging Brian Foster
2012-09-10 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] xfs: support a tag-based inode_ag_iterator Brian Foster
2012-09-10 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] xfs: create helper to check whether to free eofblocks on inode Brian Foster
2012-09-11 5:27 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2012-09-10 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] xfs: export xfs_free_eofblocks() and return EAGAIN on trylock failure Brian Foster
2012-09-10 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] xfs: create function to scan and clear EOFBLOCKS inodes Brian Foster
2012-09-10 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] xfs: add XFS_IOC_FREE_EOFBLOCKS ioctl Brian Foster
2012-09-10 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] xfs: add enhanced filtering to EOFBLOCKS scan Brian Foster
2012-09-10 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] xfs: add background scanning to clear EOFBLOCKS inodes Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120911052743.GB11511@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox