From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q8D7nNld113613 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 02:49:24 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Xjo5lwnnQjiGNF2K (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:50:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1TC4Bv-0008D7-0r for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 07:50:27 +0000 Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 03:50:26 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: userspace trees Message-ID: <20120913075026.GA27256@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com It seems with the kernel.org account purge last year and me being way to busy it seems like the -dev trees of the XFS userspace get very little attention. What do people think about retiring them and using the oss trees exclusively again for now? Right now the trees are getting a bit out of sync which isn't a good thing. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs