From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q8DELQcp168655 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:21:27 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id hGoVBkbR5IVVeM5w for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 07:22:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8DEMWFW015567 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:22:33 -0400 Received: from andromeda.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-113-109.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.109]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8DEMTdQ024866 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:22:32 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:22:29 -0300 From: Carlos Maiolino Subject: Re: userspace trees Message-ID: <20120913142229.GA4382@andromeda.usersys.redhat.com> References: <20120913075026.GA27256@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120913075026.GA27256@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 03:50:26AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > It seems with the kernel.org account purge last year and me being way to > busy it seems like the -dev trees of the XFS userspace get very little > attention. What do people think about retiring them and using the oss > trees exclusively again for now? Right now the trees are getting a bit > out of sync which isn't a good thing. > Maintaining oss only looks easier to me and less error prone (in regards on keep trees synchronized) than still keep the kernel.org xfs tree. To be honest I've never used the kernel.org xfs trees, so, at least for me this makes sense. -- --Carlos _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs