From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q8I6eDx1019855 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 01:40:13 -0500 Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id GZA7SDVuMCx2T7u1 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 23:41:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:40:39 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? Message-ID: <20120918064039.GS11511@dastard> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Theodore Ts'o Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:04:34PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > Does anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA handy? As near as I > can tell xfstests doesn't have any tests for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA > functionality, and I was hoping someone had some test programs and test > sets already written. Perhaps a cc to xfs@oss.sgi.com so the xfstests maintainers see the question would be a sensible idea? As it is, there are tests pending check-in that test seek-data/seek-hole functionality - they were used to verify the unwritten extent aware XFS implementation that recently went into the kernel.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs