From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q8IIEn3Q078270 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:14:51 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:15:56 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" Subject: Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? Message-ID: <20120918181556.GC28689@thunk.org> References: <20120918064039.GS11511@dastard> <50588898.6050802@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50588898.6050802@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Mark Tinguely Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:43:36AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: > xfstest 285 and 286 (I believe these tests were only in the OSS > version and not in the kernel.org developers version of xfstests). Hi Mark, Could you clarify what the relationship is between the OSS xfstests tree and the one on kernel.org? Is the OSS tree always ahead of the kernel.org tree (i.e., are the commits in the OSS tree a superset of the ones in the kernel.org tree)? I had been under the impression that commits flowed from the kernel.org tree to the OSS tree, but it sounds like I was misinformed on that point? Thanks, - Ted _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs