From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] xfs: create helper to check whether to free eofblocks on inode
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:59:17 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120928065917.GF25626@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348767952-24229-4-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:45:47PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> This check is used in multiple places to determine whether we
> should check for (and potentially free) post EOF blocks on an
> inode. Add a helper to consolidate the check.
>
> Note that when we remove an inode from the cache (xfs_inactive()),
> we are required to trim post-EOF blocks even if the inode is marked
> preallocated or append-only to maintain correct space accounting.
> The 'force' parameter to xfs_can_free_eofblocks() specifies whether
> we should ignore the prealloc/append-only status of the inode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
....
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.h
> index 447e146..d5701e3 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.h
> @@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
> #ifndef _XFS_VNODEOPS_H
> #define _XFS_VNODEOPS_H 1
>
> +#include "xfs_bmap_btree.h"
> +#include "xfs_dinode.h"
> +#include "xfs_inode.h"
> +
> struct attrlist_cursor_kern;
> struct file;
> struct iattr;
Generally we try to avoid including XFS header files in XFS
header files, and instead order the header files in the .c files
appropriately.
> @@ -9,8 +13,42 @@ struct iovec;
> struct kiocb;
> struct pipe_inode_info;
> struct uio;
> -struct xfs_inode;
>
> +/*
> + * Test whether it is appropriate to check an inode for and free post EOF
> + * blocks. The 'force' parameter determines whether we should also consider
> + * regular files that are marked preallocated or append-only.
> + */
> +static inline bool
> +xfs_can_free_eofblocks(struct xfs_inode *ip, bool force)
> +{
> + /* prealloc/delalloc exists only on regular files */
> + if (!S_ISREG(ip->i_d.di_mode))
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * Zero sized files with no cached pages and delalloc blocks will not
> + * have speculative prealloc/delalloc blocks to remove.
> + */
> + if (VFS_I(ip)->i_size == 0 &&
> + VN_CACHED(VFS_I(ip)) == 0 &&
> + ip->i_delayed_blks == 0)
> + return false;
> +
> + /* If we haven't read in the extent list, then don't do it now. */
> + if (!(ip->i_df.if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS))
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * Do not free real preallocated or append-only files unless the file
> + * has delalloc blocks and we are forced to remove them.
> + */
> + if (ip->i_d.di_flags & (XFS_DIFLAG_PREALLOC | XFS_DIFLAG_APPEND))
> + if (!force || ip->i_delayed_blks == 0)
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
And I'd say that function is too large for a static inline function
in a header file, so moving it to xfs_inode.c is probably
appropriate. I know, I asked you to write it like this, but
not looking at it for a couple weeks brings new persepctive ;)
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-28 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-27 17:45 [PATCH v4 0/8] speculative preallocation inode tracking Brian Foster
2012-09-27 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] xfs: add EOFBLOCKS inode tagging/untagging Brian Foster
2012-09-28 7:04 ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-28 20:40 ` Brian Foster
2012-09-27 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] xfs: support a tag-based inode_ag_iterator Brian Foster
2012-09-28 7:05 ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-27 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] xfs: create helper to check whether to free eofblocks on inode Brian Foster
2012-09-28 6:59 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2012-09-28 20:41 ` Brian Foster
2012-09-27 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] xfs: export xfs_free_eofblocks() and return EAGAIN on trylock failure Brian Foster
2012-09-28 7:00 ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-27 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] xfs: create function to scan and clear EOFBLOCKS inodes Brian Foster
2012-09-28 7:21 ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-28 20:41 ` Brian Foster
2012-09-27 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] xfs: add XFS_IOC_FREE_EOFBLOCKS ioctl Brian Foster
2012-09-28 7:25 ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-27 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] xfs: add enhanced filtering to EOFBLOCKS scan Brian Foster
2012-09-28 7:53 ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-28 20:42 ` Brian Foster
2012-09-27 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] xfs: add background scanning to clear EOFBLOCKS inodes Brian Foster
2012-09-28 8:00 ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-28 20:42 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120928065917.GF25626@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox