From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q95IEIlm085191 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 13:14:19 -0500 Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:15:43 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [patch v4 06/13] [PATCH 06/13] xfs: xfs_sync_data is redundant. Message-ID: <20121005181543.GA1056@infradead.org> References: <20121005171853.985930109@sgi.com> <20121005171946.330155632@sgi.com> <506F1F21.6000104@sgi.com> <20121005180446.GN25175@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121005180446.GN25175@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ben Myers Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, Mark Tinguely , Dave Chinner On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 01:04:46PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > Christoph suggested that xfs_flush_inodes should take an xfs_mount instead of > an inode. It is operating on the super_block level to flush multiple inodes > rather than the single inode whose pointer was passed in, so I moved it from > xfs_inode.h to xfs_mount.h. It's more than a trivial wrapper now, so I'd suggest to move out of line to e.g. xfs_super.c _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs