public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [patch v4 04/13] [PATCH 04/13] xfs: sync work is now only periodic log work
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:16:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121005181645.GB1056@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121005171945.888412779@sgi.com>

On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 12:18:57PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
>  		ASSERT(mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_RDONLY);
>  	}
>  
> +	xfs_log_work_queue(mp);
> +
>  	return error;

I still think queueing the work item here if we return a failure is
the wrong thing to do.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-05 18:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-05 17:18 [patch v4 00/13] xfs: remove the xfssyncd mess Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:18 ` [patch v4 01/13] [PATCH 01/13] xfs: xfs_syncd_stop must die Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:18 ` [patch v4 02/13] [PATCH 02/13] xfs: rationalise xfs_mount_wq users Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:18 ` [patch v4 03/13] [PATCH 03/13] xfs: dont run the sync work if the filesystem is Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:18 ` [patch v4 04/13] [PATCH 04/13] xfs: sync work is now only periodic log work Ben Myers
2012-10-05 18:16   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2012-10-05 18:31     ` Mark Tinguely
2012-10-05 17:18 ` [patch v4 05/13] [PATCH 05/13] xfs: Bring some sanity to log unmounting Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:18 ` [patch v4 06/13] [PATCH 06/13] xfs: xfs_sync_data is redundant Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:55   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-10-05 18:04     ` Ben Myers
2012-10-05 18:15       ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-05 18:15       ` Mark Tinguely
2012-10-05 17:19 ` [patch v4 07/13] [PATCH 07/13] xfs: syncd workqueue is no more Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:59   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-10-05 17:19 ` [patch v4 08/13] [PATCH 08/13] xfs: xfs_sync_fsdata is redundant Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:19 ` [patch v4 09/13] [PATCH 09/13] xfs: move xfs_quiesce_attr() into xfs_super.c Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:19 ` [patch v4 10/13] [PATCH 10/13] xfs: xfs_quiesce_attr() should quiesce the log like Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:19 ` [patch v4 11/13] [PATCH 11/13] xfs: rename xfs_sync.[ch] to xfs_icache.[ch] Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:19 ` [patch v4 12/13] [PATCH 12/13] xfs: move inode locking functions to xfs_inode.c Ben Myers
2012-10-05 17:19 ` [patch v4 13/13] [PATCH 13/13] xfs: remove xfs_iget.c Ben Myers
2012-10-06  1:31 ` [patch v4 00/13] xfs: remove the xfssyncd mess Dave Chinner
2012-10-06 17:37   ` Ben Myers
2012-10-08  0:33     ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121005181645.GB1056@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=bpm@sgi.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox