From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q99JhsjO094173 for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 14:43:54 -0500 Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.141]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id l0GXOGROrtZB7Y7C for ; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 12:45:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 06:45:22 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: report projid32bit feature in geometry call Message-ID: <20121009194522.GL23644@dastard> References: <507476F1.3080503@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <507476F1.3080503@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs-oss On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:11:45PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > When xfs gained the projid32bit feature, it was never added to > the FSGEOMETRY ioctl feature flags, so it's not queryable without > this patch. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen > --- > > note1: is there a reason we had gaps in the flags? No idea. I don't think it matters, though. > note2: I don't *think* this requires a new version for the ioctl No, it doesn't - the structure format is unchanged. Looks good. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs