From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q9B8egG9073228 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 03:40:43 -0500 Received: from mail-out3.booking.com (mail-out3.booking.com [91.195.237.20]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id M2uy6nIGINxlTNZm (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 01:42:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:42:20 +0200 From: Marcin Deranek Subject: Re: Performance degradation over time Message-ID: <20121011104220.133383dc@booking.com> In-Reply-To: <20121010233704.GC23644@dastard> References: <20121010105142.148519ca@booking.com> <20121010233704.GC23644@dastard> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:37:04 +1100 Dave Chinner wrote: > Use a more recent distro. I reworked the metadata caching algorithms > a couple of years ago to avoid these sorts of problems with memory > reclaim. I can give a shot CentOS 6.x although that might take some time.. Marcin _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs