From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/10] xfs: add quota id filtering to eofblocks scan
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:42:22 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121023014222.GL4291@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1349446636-8611-9-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 10:17:14AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> Support quota ID filtering in the eofblocks scan. The caller must
> set the XFS_EOF_FLAGS_QUOTA flags bit, quota ID and quota type. The
> associated quota type must be enabled on the mounted filesystem.
I'm wondering if this even needs quota enabled to filter based on a
uid, gid, or prid?
The quota part of it seem irrelevant to the filtering that is being
executed - we are only matching against the inode uid/gid/prid, not
against dquots - and I can see situations where just being able to
filter on a given uid/gid might be useful in a multi-user
environment regardless of whether quotas are being used.
Indeed, even testing is made much easier if we don't have to
juggle quota mount options to test the filtering....
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> index 35efdda..b39970b 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> @@ -1171,6 +1171,22 @@ xfs_reclaim_inodes_count(
> }
>
> STATIC int
> +xfs_inode_match_quota_id(
> + struct xfs_inode *ip,
> + struct xfs_eofblocks *eofb)
> +{
> + unsigned int type = xfs_quota_type(eofb->eof_q_type);
> + if (type == XFS_DQ_USER)
> + return ip->i_d.di_uid == eofb->eof_q_id;
> + else if (type == XFS_DQ_GROUP)
> + return ip->i_d.di_gid == eofb->eof_q_id;
> + else if (type == XFS_DQ_PROJ)
> + return xfs_get_projid(ip) == eofb->eof_q_id;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Why do you need xfs_quota_type() here? why not just:
switch (type) {
case XQM_USRQUOTA:
return ip->i_d.di_uid == eofb->eof_q_id;
case XQM_GRPQUOTA:
return ip->i_d.di_gid == eofb->eof_q_id;
case XQM_PRJQUOTA:
return xfs_get_projid(ip) == eofb->eof_q_id;
default:
break;
}
return 0;
> @@ -1194,6 +1211,13 @@ xfs_inode_free_eofblocks(
> mapping_tagged(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY))
> return 0;
>
> + if (eofb) {
> + /* filter by quota id */
> + if (eofb->eof_flags & XFS_EOF_FLAGS_QUOTA &&
> + !xfs_inode_match_quota_id(ip, eofb))
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> ret = xfs_free_eofblocks(ip->i_mount, ip, true);
>
> /* don't revisit the inode if we're not waiting */
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> index ad4352f..547363b 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> @@ -1613,6 +1613,14 @@ xfs_file_ioctl(
> if (eofb.eof_version != XFS_EOFBLOCKS_VERSION)
> return -XFS_ERROR(EINVAL);
>
> + if (eofb.eof_flags & XFS_EOF_FLAGS_QUOTA) {
> + unsigned int type = xfs_quota_type(eofb.eof_q_type);
> + if ((type == XFS_DQ_USER && !XFS_IS_UQUOTA_ON(mp)) ||
> + (type == XFS_DQ_GROUP && !XFS_IS_GQUOTA_ON(mp)) ||
> + (type == XFS_DQ_PROJ && !XFS_IS_PQUOTA_ON(mp)))
> + return -XFS_ERROR(EINVAL);
> + }
Again, I don't really see the reason for needing xfs_quota_type()
here, and whether the quota check is relevant at all...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-23 1:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-05 14:17 [PATCH v5 00/10] speculative preallocation inode tracking Brian Foster
2012-10-05 14:17 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] xfs: add EOFBLOCKS inode tagging/untagging Brian Foster
2012-10-05 14:17 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] xfs: support a tag-based inode_ag_iterator Brian Foster
2012-10-05 14:17 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] xfs: create helper to check whether to free eofblocks on inode Brian Foster
2012-10-23 0:58 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-05 14:17 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] xfs: make xfs_free_eofblocks() non-static, return EAGAIN on trylock failure Brian Foster
2012-10-05 14:17 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] xfs: create function to scan and clear EOFBLOCKS inodes Brian Foster
2012-10-23 1:01 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-05 14:17 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] xfs: add XFS_IOC_FREE_EOFBLOCKS ioctl Brian Foster
2012-10-11 14:13 ` Ben Myers
2012-10-11 22:35 ` Brian Foster
2012-10-15 22:46 ` Ben Myers
2012-10-15 23:49 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-16 1:39 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-17 22:40 ` Ben Myers
2012-10-18 12:16 ` Brian Foster
2012-10-18 15:46 ` Ben Myers
2012-10-18 16:23 ` Brian Foster
2012-10-22 7:34 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-22 13:23 ` Brian Foster
2012-10-22 22:22 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-23 1:31 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-24 16:16 ` Brian Foster
2012-10-24 19:27 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-05 14:17 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] xfs: make xfs_quota_type() non-static Brian Foster
2012-10-23 1:31 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-05 14:17 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] xfs: add quota id filtering to eofblocks scan Brian Foster
2012-10-23 1:42 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2012-10-24 16:18 ` Brian Foster
2012-10-24 19:41 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-24 23:02 ` Brian Foster
2012-10-25 0:02 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-25 0:29 ` Brian Foster
2012-10-05 14:17 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] xfs: add minimum file size " Brian Foster
2012-10-23 1:43 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-05 14:17 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] xfs: add background scanning to clear eofblocks inodes Brian Foster
2012-10-23 1:55 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-19 21:02 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] speculative preallocation inode tracking Mark Tinguely
2012-10-21 14:00 ` Brian Foster
2012-10-21 17:53 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-10-21 20:31 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-10-21 22:28 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-23 19:10 ` Ben Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121023014222.GL4291@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox